哪位英语高手能帮忙翻译一下啊，急用！！！

Manufacturing knowledge management performance evaluation of an effective knowledge management performance evaluation should be a systematic index system standardization of the assessment process and a good feedback mechanism. Manufacturing enterprises to implement knowledge management performance evaluation of the need for embodied in : ① knowledge management different from the management of physical assets, It is the enterprise of "knowledge" start, but the dominant enterprise knowledge and tacit knowledge management is no uniform standard, effective management of a certain degree of difficulty. Therefore, in order to meet the ever increasing competitive environment, enterprises to explore and establish their own enterprises for the evaluation system is particularly important. ② gradually establish and improve knowledge management performance evaluation system and the formation of evaluation information, discovering knowledge acquisition, the development, use, sharing, and other aspects of promoting knowledge management activities continued to improve. ③ play evaluation system incentives. Effective evaluation and incentive mechanism combining to stimulate team and the staff's enthusiasm and creativity, improving the level of knowledge sharing. Therefore, the evaluation process is to create enterprise value. ④ of knowledge management for effective evaluation of the situation, enable managers to understand the manufacturing enterprise knowledge management in inadequate, understand the impact of organizational development lies the key factor for manufacturing enterprises to improve the organization provide a theoretical basis. 5.1 manufacturing knowledge management performance evaluation of the basic design principles of knowledge management performance evaluation system of selection and Total must be scientific management theory and statistical theory, this is evaluation index system standardized, scientific foundation. Manufacturing enterprises in the design of the evaluation system, we should strive to abide by the following principles [28] : ① systemic. Indicators should be designed to reflect the logical relationship. ② hierarchy. Indicators not attached to each other, nor can the different aspects of the contents of the same indicators. ③ sub-sexual. Indicators of meaning not too much, lest different assessment of the content indicators have different interpretations. ④ operability. Evaluation should not be too complicated, so easy to evaluate. ⑤ comparability. Indicators to have horizontal and vertical comparability. Their specific design process is used first investigation or the expert discussions of the complete preliminary design; followed by the convening of the company's top management and has many years of experience in project management consulting staff on the indicators of the ease, representation and practical value assessment, collection good feedback and make necessary revisions and improvements; Finally, select true, easy availability of a viable evaluation information and knowledge management determine the optimal performance evaluation indicators. 5.2 manufacturing knowledge management performance evaluation of the screening principle of the selection of indicators to be followed in the following two principles : While evaluating the organization of enterprises, manpower, technology, market, knowledge systems of these resources in a knowledge management framework configuration, whether they are conducive to knowledge management are effectively implemented. For example : team culture whether it is conducive to the development of knowledge management; Company information system support the technology to meet the requirements of knowledge management, the staff position (quality of the staff, staffing) meet knowledge management goals; Evaluation of the other knowledge to manage their own business organizations, human, technology, and market aspects of this role, which is knowledge into an effective strength of the fit. If knowledge management whether it is conducive to enhancing the effectiveness of the organization, knowledge management to improve staff skills contributions Knowledge Management for the contribution of technological innovation, whether the team accumulated knowledge has increased, Knowledge management whether it is conducive to market development and maintenance, and whether it helps enhance their adaptability to the market, and so on. ① should consider the purpose of the study. Index system to be created in which the problem to be solved and research goals and objectives. ② correctly handle the quantitative and qualitative indicators of the indicators. Quantitative and qualitative indicators indicators combine in order to build a complete system of standards. ③ correctly handle related indicators and weight distribution relationship. In indicator deletion process, the need to properly handle the weight and relevance of the relationship between and not weight indicators of the system on behalf of the extent of the impact, and simply cut small weight indicators, not simply based on the correlation coefficient between the indicators representative of the size of the overlap between the target level for the deletion. ④ due to considerations of indicators and targets for the independence of the process of computation workload, to realize the significance of indicators similar and overlapping of the target finishing, or even delete some indicators.本回答被提问者采纳