《傲慢与偏见》观后感， 一千字

“Any library is a good library that does not contain a volume by Jane Austen”, when this words about Jane Austen given by Mark Twin first came upon to me, I was, just in your expectation, a little bit surprised. Gradually, however, when I know more about the characteristics of her works, I think the judgement of Mark Twin makes sense in some degree. Especially after I have finished her work Pride and Prejudice and compared it with the contemporary production The Red and the Black written by Stendhal. Less reflection and exposure on social conflicts among different classes is a big pity for Austen’s works, as well as for the readers. Still, however, Austen’s unique interpretation towards marriage is the distinguished feature of her literary accomplishment. And I want to give some reflection on the different kinds of relationships and marriages in Pride and Prejudice.

Five different types of relationships or marriages, as far as I am concerned, are presented in this book.

The first type, undoubtedly, is the relationship between Jane and Mr. Bingley. They met at a party and almost fell in love with each other just after their first encounter. Bingley’s wealth and courtesy, Jane’s beauty and tenderness, and the similarities in their personality are all the factors that contribute to the relationship. So, though I believe, actually, there is some kind of love between the young lady and the gentleman, it is not the pure and true love, their combination is not for no intention but for some certain desire. So I would like to call their relationship as “Secular Love”.

Contrasting to the relationship between Jane and Mr. Bingley, the marriage between Charlotte and Mr.Collins is much less romantic, or no romance at all. One is the Cinderella in reality equipped with no prince, the other is a priest, old and ugly. Their marriage, of course, has no love but compromise. Even Elizabeth thinks “Charlotte the wife of Mr. Collins, was a most humiliating picture!” But what could she do? Just as she said, she is not romantic and she asks only a comfortable home, and this is within Mr. Collins ability. Comparing with being a 27-year-old burden to her family,at least for her, marrying Mr. Collins is the best choice. So as for them, I call “Rational Love” or rather------ “Rational Combination”.

Another couple is Mrs. Bennet and Mr. Bennet. Just in the first chapter, I wondered why two people with such different characteristics could live together for 23 years. The wonder disappeared when the explanation was offered by Austen in Chapter 42 about Mr. Bennet’s attitude towards his wife. Captivated by youth and beauty, he married her and very early in their marriage, after knowing the disposition of her, ended his affection and used her ignorance to contribute his amusement, having impropriety of his behavior as a husband. Neither for Mr. Bennet nor for Mrs. Bennet this marriage is quite fair or contented, but both of them should pay, and had already paid the bill of their “Hasty Love”.

Lydia’s relationship with Wickham, to some extent, is similar with her parents’. Mr. Bennet was captivated by the beauty of his wife and Lydia was fascinated by the handsome appearance of Wickham. Compared with her parents’ marriage, however, Lydia’s relationship with Wickham would only turn out a much more unpleasant one, for their marriage is based on the fulfillment of vanity and the desire of property. So I consider their relationship as “Orectic Incorporation”

And finally here comes the relationship between Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. When I first finished the movie of Pride and Prejudice, I still wondered why there is a love flame between them. One is so proud and the other full of prejudice, but when I read more details about this work, the answer has emerged. “Love”, a word we are so familiar with, but what is love? In Austen’s work, I gradually know that love is not just as abstract as we often regard. Take Elizabeth, for example, her love for Daisy is based on two things: respect and gratitude. She respects his valuable qualities: nobility and kindness, and even Wickham had done something so bad to him and his sister, he still didn’t blame him before others or let him lose all dignity in public. Also, she is grateful to Mr. Darcy, for his love, for his forgiveness about her bad manners when she rejected him, for his help to her sister’s marriage and her family’s fame. And finally, these turned out her attachment, affection and love for him. As for Darcy, his attention to Elizabeth was first on her eyes, full of liveliness, thoughts and pursuits and unlike any other ladies, she is such a unique girl that she didn’t flatter him at all, so for him she is so extraordinary and attractive. And Elizabeth got his respect and love because of her own independence, liveliness and uniqueness. And I regard their relationship as “Spirit Love”.

Austen’s attitude towards marriage, love, status and property can still be used as a reference. Nowadays, fast food culture derives fast-food-style love, although we are in the era of fast changes, it’s better for us to love rationally and independently. Hope everyone has his real, unique love.

傲慢与偏见写由英国著名女作家简·奥斯汀仍然是英国文学的经典时下。简·奥斯汀谁是出生和生活了她的整个生活在英格兰在她的生活时间写了六本书。她的小说中描述的所有生活方式和家庭在英国的国家社会传播为她熟悉。这本书傲慢与偏见是典型的一个充分表达简氏对婚姻看法，并强调在经济利益上施加婚姻有很大的影响。
在小说中的人物都有自己对婚姻的看法。班纳特太太，例如，目的只有一个，要找到一个很好的匹配每一个她的五个女儿的。至于伊丽莎白，谁是班纳特家的二女儿说，只有深深的爱，就劝她嫁给这就是为什么她最后可能会老处女。莉迪亚和夏洛特，然而，两个极端。前者刚刚结婚的性别，而后者嫁给一个舒适的家和保护。
有被英国的社会下，在18的所有世纪形成的只是这么多不同的角色。然后，还有充满了男性和女性之间的不公平。正如简·奥斯汀说，“这是一个普遍的真理的知识，一个人拥有一个好运气的，必须在想娶位太太。“

《傲慢与偏见》是英国著名女作家简爱、奥斯丁的代表作，作品描写傲慢的单身青年达西与偏见的二小姐伊丽莎白、富裕的单身贵族`彬格莱与贤淑的大小姐吉英之间的感情纠葛。
　　其实这本书，在初一时已经接触过了，但当时对于剧情的繁杂很没有耐心，看了几章就没有了兴致，便一直搁在一旁，直至今日才重新拾起。不过再看开头几章时还是觉得很无趣，到后来明白才这里是在为以后的情景埋伏笔。
一眨眼，三十几章已经过去了，人物的性格也很明显地被作者刻画出来了。这本书中似乎只有两种人：聪明的和愚蠢的，没有绝对的好坏之分，骗子韦翰也许除外。他利用了自己巧妙的奉承能力以及一付”讨人喜欢”的仪表，迷住了伊丽莎白，不停地为自己洗刷冤情，中伤达西。可笑他的话里充满破绽，而聪明过人的伊丽莎白虽能与彬格来小姐辩驳，与咖苔琳夫人顶撞，却还是被韦翰牵着鼻子走。说实话，我并不认为伊丽莎白被骗说明他是一个”愚人”。
人，总是先入为主，达西先生傲慢、无礼的样子早已进入伊丽莎白的头脑，还怎么对他产生好感？对于旁人的点评又怎能轻易的置若罔闻？对达西产生偏见是很正常的。我说的旁人自然就是指相貌堂堂的韦翰了。不可否认，韦翰长着一张英俊的脸，表面上也装得非常”绅士”。虽有”人不可貌相”、”知人知面不知心”之说可就连我这个活在二十一世纪，以旁观者的身份看这个故事，仍然对韦翰产生好感，又岂能怨伊丽莎白这一个生活在过去时代的姑娘？
　　合上这本书，仔细地品味一番，方才发现，整部小说，之所以吸引人，完全是因为它轻松幽默的格调。伊丽莎白的嘲笑讽刺，正将那些自视绅士、淑女的贵族的本来面目暴露无疑。而伊丽莎白的父亲班纳特先生竟然以嘲笑太太、女儿为家庭快乐，幸哉？不幸哉？

镜子说：“凭理智来领会是个悲剧，凭感情来领会是个悲剧。——题记

　　镜子有一泓清净的甘露，镜子真实的看透着每一个人。镜子不会说谎。他会聚集阳光的力量，愤怒地：“燃灼”着欺骗者的心灵，却不惜用尽所有的甘露。而当镜子“空”了的时候，就真得什么也没有了。如同是湖泊的干涸，镜子，慢慢地，消失在了，人们的，眼帘之中……

　　傲慢，偏见，这两个毋庸质疑的贬义词，让简。奥斯丁的作品成为精致的象征一时之间闻名遐迩，从而傲慢与偏见也成为了脍炙人口的伟大着作。

　　简。奥斯丁生于一七七五年，卒于一八一七年。其间英国小说正处于青黄不接的是时期。当小说大师先世之后，就接踵而起以范妮。伯尼为代表的感伤派小说和哥特式传奇小说。虽然风靡，但终究因苍白无力而逐渐退出历史舞台，此后奥斯丁发表了《理智与情感》《傲慢与偏见》《劝导》等六部小说。以其理性的光芒照出了伤感、歌特小说的矫揉造作，从而现实主义小说的高潮开始启蒙。《傲慢与偏见》以男女青年的恋爱婚姻为题材。然而所不同的是，它以男女主角的爱情纠葛为主线，描述了四起姻缘，通过对照与描写，提出了道德行和行为规范的问题。

　　当我读完这部着作的时候，我为伊丽莎白和达西最终美满的结为伉俪而感到欣慰和满足。是的，是因为他们有傲慢，有偏见，才会有这一切的波折。伊丽莎白是个热情、活泼、却又不乏纯真的乡村少女形象。他不懂得勾心斗角，不懂得如何区分真实或是虚假，因而偏见在她心中产生。达西是一位上流社会的贵族，如此锋芒毕露的显赫地位，怎会使他不在心中拧成一份傲气？是的，他傲慢正因为如此，才让人们忽略了他身材魁伟，眉清目秀，举止高雅，一表人才的形象，任凭他财产再多，人们也只会认为他自高自大，目中无人，不好逢迎一样。伊丽莎白也只因为对达西的偏见，而使她清新了威克姆对达西人品的贬低之言。

　　可欣的是，达西与伊丽莎白的矛盾最终融解了。然而，设想，如果达西没有向伊丽莎白示爱意，或是在遭到拒绝和人格的侮辱后没有澄清，并放弃了对真爱的追求，那结果又会是怎样？会是一个悲剧，也许简与宾利执着的感情也会毁于一旦，莉迪娅的轻狂举动会使贝尔特家庭蒙上羞耻的阴影，名声败坏。然而这一切都没有呈现。因为达西用他理性的眼光看到了伊利沙白的纯真，他原谅了她。因为爱她，所以他会不顾祖母凯瑟琳的阻止，毅然选择了她。

　　这样起伏跌荡的爱情，仅有真挚爱情的滋润，他们是因为有了“爱”才走到一起，简与宾利，达西与伊丽莎白。他们的爱是纯粹的，而夏洛特与柯林斯的爱情则完完全全建立在金钱上。这两种截然不同的爱情观从那时起延续到至今，渗进了人类进步的历史之中。

　　我是个主张有真爱的人，因为人的一生如果是为钱而活着，那么试问，活着的意义是什么，难道只是为了拥有无忧的生活保障？当一个人成为了最富有了人，而却得不到精神上的富有，此时，当你离去的时候，余有你空空一人，拂得两袖清风却不到生命的真谛。生命是无比可贵的，紧紧地栓紧它，不能松手。我不曾了解爱情，当我知道它得来不易，它像是坐在海绵里的玻璃花瓶，也许一个侧身，就碎了，也许它永远被海绵围绕，安静的置放在那儿。谁都不知道我的会怎样，但至少，人的精神寄托是无尽与可贵的，爱情是无法用金钱来估价的。我羡慕爸妈永远幸福与甜蜜的爱情，尽管时间会冲淡一切，可在他们的平淡中，始终孕育着一股强大的美，向我冲击，向生命进发。

　　镜子不是透明的，但镜子会反射无限的能量。镜子不会说谎，当它枯竭的时候，它的心就真正空空如也。那，才是一个真正的悲剧。本回答被提问者采纳