请高手帮忙翻译成英文，谢谢！
用最简单的话翻译就行。不要用在线翻译工具。
这张照片的名字为“虎视眈眈”。
一个非洲小孩因疾病和饥饿使得命在旦夕时，旁边即刻就有一只秃鹫虎视眈眈盯着小孩，秃鹫在耐心等待小孩的生命终结。因为小孩的生命一结束，其尸体立刻就会成为秃鹫的一顿美餐。
这幅照片获得了美国新闻界最高奖普利策奖，但是作者凯文卡特受到了人们的指责：这位记者为什么不丢下相机而给那个快饿死的孩子一壶水、一块面包？为什么不救那个孩子于死神的镰刀与秃鹫的喙爪之下？ 一个孩子生命的价值难道不敌一幅新闻照片或一个新闻奖项？这位记者对舆论解释 说，当时非洲该国饿殍遍野，到处都是死亡，面对灾民 的死亡谁也束手无策；当他怀着沉重的心情离开当地灾区，当执行任务的飞机已经发动，在他正要登机时，他看到了这幅令人心碎的人间惨象，就立即回头抢拍下来 ，而后不得不迅速离去。但是舆论没有因为他的解释而停息，最后这位记者以自己 的生命而谢天下：他自杀了。
秃鹫等待着一顿美餐，孩子马上就要为另一个生命付出贡献．大自然的法则，谁能说出其中有什么不对？
因为我们是人类，人性使那个记者以及所有善良的人看到了这个场景的残酷．当人们纷纷指责这位记者的时候，记者的良知使他承受不了社会的压力而选择了放弃生命以告慰天下．
想想这张照片，再想想那些指责与这位记者，那个孩子与这位记者的命运有什么不同？
孩子最后做了秃鹫的美餐，这位记者何偿不是做了那些”善良”人的精神大餐？
This photo named " eye covetously".
A vulture is staring at an african child who suffers from hunger and illness, waiting her time to leave the world. Once the child died, the body will be a meal for vulture.
this photo won the highest prize in American Journalism--- the pulitzer prizes , but the author was blamed by the public: the reportor why not try to save the little kid, with a piece of bread or even a glass of water? why not to stop the vulture and grab the little life from death? Is it to say that a vivid life is not even weathy than a news picture or a prize? the report explaned that death comes everywhere at that time in africa and one can do nothing for the refugees. when he was going to leave disaster area with grey mind, when the chopper's engine had started, he saw this image and press the shutter just as aboarding. he took the photo and had to leave right away. the public voice did not stop because of his explain and the author end his life for this photo.
the vulture is waiting for a feast and the little child will be sacrificed for another life,it is natural rules and who can say it's wrong?
Because we are human, the humanity of that reporter, as well as all the kindess people, make us to see the cruel scene. when all the public accused that reporter, he has to choose to end his life due to Social pressure of public opinion.
think about the photo and the innocent author, what is the difference between the little child and the author? the child became a meal for vulture and the author, became a joke for those "kindness" ones.
A vulture is staring at an african child who suffers from hunger and illness, waiting her time to leave the world. Once the child died, the body will be a meal for vulture.
this photo won the highest prize in American Journalism--- the pulitzer prizes , but the author was blamed by the public: the reportor why not try to save the little kid, with a piece of bread or even a glass of water? why not to stop the vulture and grab the little life from death? Is it to say that a vivid life is not even weathy than a news picture or a prize? the report explaned that death comes everywhere at that time in africa and one can do nothing for the refugees. when he was going to leave disaster area with grey mind, when the chopper's engine had started, he saw this image and press the shutter just as aboarding. he took the photo and had to leave right away. the public voice did not stop because of his explain and the author end his life for this photo.
the vulture is waiting for a feast and the little child will be sacrificed for another life,it is natural rules and who can say it's wrong?
Because we are human, the humanity of that reporter, as well as all the kindess people, make us to see the cruel scene. when all the public accused that reporter, he has to choose to end his life due to Social pressure of public opinion.
think about the photo and the innocent author, what is the difference between the little child and the author? the child became a meal for vulture and the author, became a joke for those "kindness" ones.
温馨提示：内容为网友见解，仅供参考
第1个回答 2013-03-21
This picture named "look at fiercely as a tiger does".
A child in Africa from disease and hunger makes a goner, next to immediately have a vulture look at fiercely as a tiger does staring at the child, vultures waiting patiently at the end of life. Because the child's life was over, the body will immediately become a vulture of a good meal.
The picture won the highest award in American Journalism Award for Pulitzer, but Kevin Carter has been accused of: the reporter why not leave the camera to the starving children in a pot of water, a piece of bread? Why not save the children under to death sickle and Buzzard beak and claws? One of the children the value of life is not the enemy of a piece of news photos or a News Awards? The reporter explained to public opinion, then Africa the starvation, death, the face of the victims died who would be at a loss what to do; when he left the local area with a heavy heart, when the mission of the aircraft has been launched, when he was about to board the plane, he saw a poignant human sight, immediately back to take down, and then I had to leave. But public opinion not because of his explanation and stopped, finally the reporter with his life and thank the world: his Dutch act.
The vultures waiting for a meal, the children will be contributing to the life of another. The law of nature, who can tell me what's wrong with them?
Because we are human, human nature to the reporter and all the good people to see this scene cruelty. When people have denounced the reporter, the reporter conscience so that he can not afford the social pressure to choose to give up life to show the world.
Think of this picture, then think of the accused and the reporter, what is the difference between the child and the reporter's fate?
The children finally do vultures feast, the reporter why not do what "good" people's spiritual feast?
在线自己翻译的，望采纳
A child in Africa from disease and hunger makes a goner, next to immediately have a vulture look at fiercely as a tiger does staring at the child, vultures waiting patiently at the end of life. Because the child's life was over, the body will immediately become a vulture of a good meal.
The picture won the highest award in American Journalism Award for Pulitzer, but Kevin Carter has been accused of: the reporter why not leave the camera to the starving children in a pot of water, a piece of bread? Why not save the children under to death sickle and Buzzard beak and claws? One of the children the value of life is not the enemy of a piece of news photos or a News Awards? The reporter explained to public opinion, then Africa the starvation, death, the face of the victims died who would be at a loss what to do; when he left the local area with a heavy heart, when the mission of the aircraft has been launched, when he was about to board the plane, he saw a poignant human sight, immediately back to take down, and then I had to leave. But public opinion not because of his explanation and stopped, finally the reporter with his life and thank the world: his Dutch act.
The vultures waiting for a meal, the children will be contributing to the life of another. The law of nature, who can tell me what's wrong with them?
Because we are human, human nature to the reporter and all the good people to see this scene cruelty. When people have denounced the reporter, the reporter conscience so that he can not afford the social pressure to choose to give up life to show the world.
Think of this picture, then think of the accused and the reporter, what is the difference between the child and the reporter's fate?
The children finally do vultures feast, the reporter why not do what "good" people's spiritual feast?
在线自己翻译的，望采纳
相似回答
