第1个回答 2008-11-02
Nature-based Environmental Protection
Nature-based environmental protection should naturally as the basis for our survival, if not natural, not to mention the existence of mankind and development of human beings are superior to some people say, no one, there would be no environmental protection, I would like to be , Said that if no one then also need to protect the environment, no one's destruction, it is a natural vitality it! Some people think that since the main body of human beings is one of the world, the world's people are all biological, and the existence of, What a ridiculous ah, history tells us that the development of human nature is a product to which, when the primitive ape from the tree down, if all of a sudden natural and what an incredible change, then the emergence of humanity becomes a A myth. I wonder if you read the human development that no documentary, a word I think there is the very classical; people, is one of the world a chance, but a few万万分之一the chance to create a human.
Not because of the existence of the animal's existence, if not, they may be more carefree life, each has its own biological existence, it has its own existence, to protect the tiger, mouse Be wiped out entirely in accordance with its own human effects imposed on it, if not human, you can say the kind of animal that is useful is it harmful?
Athens destruction of the ancient civilization, so difficult that it is not a very good description? The development of human civilization, no matter what state they are not required to survive the environment? Not nature-based environmental protection is incomplete, is a human Center of ideas, people can create, you can destroy a lot of things, but the natural, human beings are created by the right, there is no doubt that one can destroy it. Mankind of the Earth 2 is not a plan to once again failed It?
中文 » 英语 翻译
更好的翻译建议
感谢您为 Google 翻译提供翻译建议。我们会利用您的建议在将来更新我们的系统时提高翻译质量。 Nature-based Environmental Protection <br> Nature-based environmental protection should naturally as the basis for our survival, if not natural, not to mention the existence of mankind and development of human beings are superior to some people say, no one, there would be no environmental protection, I would like to be , Said that if no one then also need to protect the environment, no one's destruction, it is a natural vitality it! Some people think that since the main body of human beings is one of the world, the world's people are all biological, and the existence of, What a ridiculous ah, history tells us that the development of human nature is a product to which, when the primitive ape from the tree down, if all of a sudden natural and what an incredible change, then the emergence of humanity becomes a A myth. I wonder if you read the human development that no documentary, a word I think there is the very classical; people, is one of the world a chance, but a few万万分之一the chance to create a human. <br> Not because of the existence of the animal's existence, if not, they may be more carefree life, each has its own biological existence, it has its own existence, to protect the tiger, mouse Be wiped out entirely in accordance with its own human effects imposed on it, if not human, you can say the kind of animal that is useful is it harmful? <br> Athens destruction of the ancient civilization, so difficult that it is not a very good description? The development of human civilization, no matter what state they are not required to survive the environment? Not nature-based environmental protection is incomplete, is a human Center of ideas, people can create, you can destroy a lot of things, but the natural, human beings are created by the right, there is no doubt that one can destroy it. Mankind of the Earth 2 is not a plan to once again failed It?
翻译网页
中文 » 英语 翻译
Google 主页 - 关于 Google 翻译
第2个回答 2008-11-02
Protect the environment is that protect the environment should take the natural world as at ease , is our survival basis at ease, if not natural, with existence of farther from being human being developing, that somebody criticizes person is a man-- the wisest of all creatures , does not have person, protect the environment far from being, but I want to be right , the environment needs destroying protecting , not having person , ought to a slice be that are full of vigour comparing with others at ease now if not having person! Some people main body from thinking that human being is the world, in the world all living things is conduct, but existence's, what laughable Oh, development of history tell us, human being's turn up has become a myth when person walks down on being only a outcome of nature but complying with a tree in order to, pawning primitive anthropopithecus, if what inconceivable change's words to happened at ease suddenly. That documentary wondering if everybody had looked at human being developing is had no, that there has one talking about my feel like is to be skill in a canon's very; People's turn up , a chance being the world, and be several tens of thousand one over ten-thousand's chance have created human being. Animal's existence is not the existence because of person , they maybe are able to live to be light of heart especially , every kind of living things has there exist in itself value , also, the significance , tiger that It both there exists in itself need to protect , the mouse needs to be died out if not having person,being that human being is based on an impact of it over oneself completely but foisting it on, if that human being is absent , you can say that animal is to that having benefit is harmful? Acient civilized Athens complete collapse , very good explanation difficult to arrive at fault? What realm human being's civilization arrives at disregarding developing , is not to need the environment existing? Not taking the natural world as this protect the environment is incomplete , being as well as having anthropocentric doctrine thought's , person is not bad be created by, can destroy a lot of thing, but natural woollen cloth , be that human being is not bad be created by but undisputed, person can destroy it. Is the earth of human being plan 2 not that the once has failed?